alohavova.blogg.se - Vmware workstation player vs virtualbox reddit

#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT FULL#
#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT PRO#
#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT SOFTWARE#
#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT LICENSE#
#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT FREE#

The latest release, VMware Workstation Pro 17. You can use VMware to set up a private cloud, to manage mobile devices in your corporate network, to protect endpoints, and of course, to virtualize stuff.įor the purpose of this comparison, we’ll mostly be looking at VMware Workstation Pro - their desktop virtualization tool for Windows and Linux - and VMware Fusion - their desktop virtualization tool for Mac.

VMware isn’t a single product as much an ecosystem of connected tools and applications.

What are VMware’s Workstation top features?.

It’s not quite an apples-to-oranges scenario, but it is like comparing apples from two different orchards. VMWare and Virtualbox, although both reliable, bear some distinct differences that make a lateral comparison complicated. It’s not surprising that roughly 80% of x86 server workloads are now virtualized, and the average server runs 16 simultaneous VMs.ĪLSO READ: Top Five Security-as-a-Service Providers

Transfer virtual machines between devices and servers.

Run legacy programs that require an older OS on a machine with a newer OS.

Set up and regulate encrypted corporate desktops for remote employees or employees using their own devices.

#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT SOFTWARE#

Deploy and test your own software on multiple operating systems without needing multiple devices.Evaluate new apps and systems in a safe, partitioned environment.The ability to run multiple, simultaneous operating systems as VMs from a single device means you can: In the modern IT environment, desktop virtualization can be extremely useful. VirtualBox, you’re looking for a tool that will help you create and provision virtual machines (VMs) on desktop devices running an x86-based platform. Both solutions offer a “snapshot” feature that has proven highly popular as a response to one of the inherent challenges of virtualization: mistakes.VirtualBox is excellent if you only need to run VMs on a few machines and want access to a command line interface in addition to the GUI.Workstation/Fusion is obviously the better choice is you already work in a VMware environment.For the latest business technology news, follow on Twitter. Keep up on the latest developments in virtualization at. VirtualBox 4.2," was originally published at. This story, " Review: VMware Workstation 9 vs. If you're on a tight budget or need a product with liberal licensing, go with VirtualBox. If you have the cash to spend, VMware is the easy choice. That said, VirtualBox is no slouch, and it has a few useful items that aren't available in either Workstation or VMware Player. It isn't just the performance, but the polish and the cross-integration with other VMware products that make Workstation worth the money. There are some VMware-only functions, such as upload/download to vSphere, implemented in VMware Workstation only, but not in either VirtualBox or VMware Player.įor those willing to put their money down, VMware Workstation is the easy winner.

#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT FULL#

VirtualBox also has full implementations of a few features that VMware Player has in more limited incarnations, including snapshotting, virtual-network management, and cloning of workstations.

#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT LICENSE#

(Player is also not supported by VMware, except when purchasing a license for VMware Fusion Professional.)

#VMWARE WORKSTATION PLAYER VS VIRTUALBOX REDDIT FREE#

Although it's free for personal noncommercial use, it must be formally licensed in a commercial setting. VMware Player, on the other hand, is closed source through and through. The open source edition of VirtualBox is GPLv2-licensed, while the full binary versions of VirtualBox are under a " Personal Use and Evaluation License," which precludes deployment in a business scenario. It also lets you cap network bandwidth for a VM. One feature VirtualBox has but VMware Workstation doesn't is the ability to cap a virtual machine's processor usage. The main difference is in product licensing, as VirtualBox is a little more liberally licensed than VMware Player. This makes VirtualBox handy for trying out a slightly broader range of virtual machine types than VMware Workstation.įinally, anyone looking for a free virtualization solution might ask how VirtualBox shapes up against VMware's also-free VMware Player. VirtualBox also shines with support for a variety of virtual-disk formats: VMDK, VHD, HDD (from Parallels), and QED/QCOW (from QEMU). Using a snapshot saves both time and disk space. Even handier is the ability to clone VMs, which can be done either by making a full, discrete copy of the VM or by using a snapshot as the basis for the clone. As in Workstation, you can take multiple branching snapshots of a given VM. Snapshotting in VirtualBox is at least as good as what's available in VMware Workstation.